![]() ![]() PianoTeq wins hands down in user friendliness in that regard, because the velocity of the input notes are right in front of you in the first screen, with an option to change that manually or automatically with almost zero effort. The Hammersmith has exactly the same problem, but there is a (somewhat) easy to find way to adjust that. ![]() Just for fun try it that way and see what you think. ![]() If that is correct, I was listening my "pianissimo" (and lower) with the volume boosted to be at the level of a mezzo forte to forte - that is why I described it as a "wind instrument" at least in some octaves. I think the velocity my Yamaha NU1 sends is too low for your instrument. After spending more time with it than I really wanted to, I think the root of the problem some of us are experiencing is this "different feel on different controllers". I also compared it to the free Hammersmith and to PianoTeq. I played more with it, both in Kontakt and in Aria. I did my best at overlapping the velocity layers as best I could, and of course, the velocity curve will feel different on different controllers. Also, you can adjust EQ, velocity mapping/layers, etc more easily. Its more enjoyable playing the instrument in Kontakt than in Sforzando, one reason is that I programmed the reverb by default. Kontakt has alot more flexibility and control. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |